|
So far, we've talked about two of the steps involved
in characterizing exposure: describing the source and describing
the distribution of the stressor or disturbed environment. Now we'll
examine the third key step: describing the extent of the exposure.
|
Describing
the extent of exposure is a critical step. If there is no
exposure, then there is no risk. For some assessments, assessors
may need to consider past, current, and future scenarios.
|
A receptor does not have to actually contact a stressor
for adverse effects to occur. As illustrated in the reveal activity
below on co-occurrence, stressors can simply be nearby to take effect.
For some assessments, assessors may need to consider past, current,
and future scenarios.
Reminder! Exposure can be described
in three ways:
- Contact between a stressor and receptor.
- Co-occurrence between a stressor and receptor.
- Uptake of a stressor by a receptor.
Some stressors must contact receptors to cause an
effect. The extent of contact is determined by:
- The amount or extent of the stressor in an environmental medium.
- The activity or behavior of the receptors.
An
example of the second case is the fact that predators often hunt
in specific areas (rather than at random points) at a specific site
such as a meadow or forest edge. It is unlikely that such predators
would contact contaminants in a wetland, for instance, because it
does not feed or rest there.
Some ways to quantify chemical exposure have been
developed and are elaborated on in the In-Depth unit below. Contact
between biological stressors and ecological receptors are more difficult
to measure. Risk assessors usually rely on professional judgment
to evaluate this type of contact. Contact is often assumed to occur
in areas and during times where the stressor and receptor are both
present.

|
Co-Occurrence
|
 |
Absorption
and Uptake
|
 |
Evaluating Contact
with Chemical Stressors |
Relevant
guidelines section(s): 4.2.1.3
|