|
Now we have covered the four primary approaches used to estimate
risk: field surveys, categorical rankings, process models, and comparisons
of exposure and effects data. Before moving on to the next lesson,
try the following multiple-choice quiz to evaluate what you've learned
so far.
- Which risk estimation approach is most appropriate when exposure and effects data are limited or are not easily expressed in quantitative terms?
- Process models
- Field surveys
- Correct answer: categorical rankings
- Comparisons of exposure and effects data
- Which method is most appropriate for delineating exposures and effects found in natural systems (as opposed to those found under controlled or prescribed conditions)?
- Process models
- Correct answer: field surveys
- Categorical rankings
- Comparisons of exposure and effects data
- Which method(s) can be used to estimate the combined effects of multiple chemical stressors?
- Categorical rankings
- Quotient method
- Process models
- Correct answer: both the quotient method and process models
- Which method of comparing exposure and effects data is best for incremental quantification of risks?
- Quotient method
- Comparisons incorporating variability
- Correct answer: comparisons using the entire stressor-response curve
- None of the above
|